Solar power from satellites poised to become reality within a year

zohaibahd

Posts: 588   +15
Staff
In a nutshell: The European Space Agency spent years studying space-based solar power as a potential solution for meeting one-third of the country's energy needs. Sunlight, on average, is more than 10 times as intense at the top of the atmosphere as it is at the Earth's surface. Their analysis indicated that implementing this solution would require infrastructure costing hundreds of billions of dollars, primarily in the form of geostationary satellites positioned 36,000 km above the Earth.

The daunting technical and financial hurdles have led many to dismiss the concept as a super-cool sci-fi dream that could never actually work in the real world. However, one entrepreneur believes he has cracked the code to make space-based solar power affordable and practical in the near future.

His name is Baiju Bhatt, the co-founder of the Robinhood trading app. After stepping back from his CEO role there in 2020, Bhatt launched a new startup called Aetherflux, which aims to beam solar power down from space within about a year.

Bhatt's approach sidesteps the extremely costly steps of building a massive constellation of satellites. Instead, Aetherflux is starting small with just a single satellite positioned about 500 km up in low-earth orbit.

"If we succeed, we unlock a renewable energy source for humanity that can be delivered virtually anywhere," Bhatt wrote in a LinkedIn post launching his new venture.

The plan is to launch a "kilowatt-class" solar-powered spacecraft in the next 12 to 15 months that can transmit infrared laser beams carrying solar energy down to a 10-meter ground receiver. While it won't provide much power at first, the key goals are to prove that the system works safely and efficiently.

If the demonstration is successful, Aetherflux plans to follow up with increasingly larger constellations of low-Earth orbit satellites that can collectively provide continuous, clean power on a more meaningful scale. Initially, this renewable energy stream could supply remote areas without reliable grids, such as disaster zones, mining operations, and military bases.

However, the real long-term potential lies in using space-based solar power as a baseload power source to supplement renewable sources like wind and terrestrial solar farms.

Of course, many technological and financial hurdles remain. Aetherflux has self-funded the company in the "ten-millionish range" so far, but much larger investments will be needed to scale up. There are also environmental concerns about the potential impacts of high-powered laser beams constantly passing through Earth's atmosphere, as well as the possibility of exacerbating the light pollution problem troubling astronomers around the world.

Hopefully, the benefits of this new clean energy will outweigh any potential drawbacks.

It's worth mentioning that Aetherflux isn't alone in the idea of beaming solar energy (or sunlight) to the Earth's surface via satellites. Another startup, Reflect Orbital, has recently proposed a more direct approach: bouncing sunlight onto solar farms using a constellation of small mirrored satellites.

Permalink to story:

 
This idea has been circulating for years. It's not practical due to the same atmosphere that was blocking most direct solar energy will still be in the way with pesky clouds and whatnot.

I'd rather see solar panels over roofs and parking areas with battery banks storing the excess for night time usage.
 
This idea has been circulating for years. It's not practical due to the same atmosphere that was blocking most direct solar energy will still be in the way with pesky clouds and whatnot.

I'd rather see solar panels over roofs and parking areas with battery banks storing the excess for night time usage.
Put solar panels on every parking lot, there is more than enough parking lots in the US ro supply all our energy needs
 
Fascinate idea but there is a "small" possibility that the atmosphere will absorb the energy from the infrared ray, just as it does with the rays from the sun.
Thermal energy is the vibrational frequency of the photon or an atom, electrical energy is the kinetic momentum of the charge on the electron, they are different things. One occurs in a scalar field, the other in a vector field. Because of its scalar nature (it doesn't follow a path, it occupies the nearby space, 3rd law of thermodynamics) you can't efficiently send thermal energy over long distances through a medium. The vacuum is a superconductor (zero resistance) for the thermal energy, similar to a conducting material (usually metal) in the superconducting state (very low temperature near absolute zero) is for the electrical energy.

So if you want to put solar panels outside the atmosphere, you have to find a way to send back (moving) electrons, not (vibrating) photons.

At 500km above the earth's surface, a satellite that's moving at the same speed as the earth's rotation is falling, so it needs an upward force to keep it in the air. So there is a need for a 500km metallic tower which it will need and a part at least 100km inside the earth to be stable so in total 600km tower. The metal tower is not superconductor so it will also have some electrically resistant and because of that there will be losses. In addition there is a need for an isolating connection between the upper part of the tower and the lower underground part somewhere near the earth surface so the electric current from the solar panels doesn't fall into the earth for nothing.

600Km massive metal tower is very difficult. Even 10 km is very difficult. I don't think steel can withstand the forces for the vibrations of the central mass so high above earth surface. In theory, it will be a steel structure in the shape of Eiffel Tower, but with a base of several square kilometers and it should be isolated from cities at least 1000km radius (which add and to the total electrical resistance because 1000km cables have electric resistance too).
At the positive side, the solar power on earth is 1kw/m^2 and at 500 km is (if the AI I have asked is correct) 650kw/m^2, lets say 500kw/m^2 at 500 km from the earth's surface. Solar panels have ~20% efficiency(in higher energies maybe is more or less I don’t know), so 100kw/m^2. With rough estimation there will be lost in resistances until the houses almost the half so ~70kw/m^2. Lets say that the tower can handle 10.000 m^2 movable (so they can focus on sun) solar panels (on that altitude the air pressure is very low, there will be very little resistance from air, the only problem is if the solar can handle so much radiation) so that's a ~700MWclean energy for ~12 hours per day from 1 huge tower like that. Is not much and I didn't do serious calculations but estimates. Maybe is much less or much more, but not more than double to ether side (I think). Ah one more positive, there will be additional electric current in the tower form the contact with the ions in the atmosphere, but not much.
 
Seriously? This guy is just looking to swindle investors out of their cash. Even the name of his trading app is Robinhood. He has zero experience in the aerospace or space industries but we're supposed to send him truck loads of cash because he somehow has the secret sauce that will make this 60+ year old concept work when no one else could.
 
Seriously? This guy is just looking to swindle investors out of their cash. Even the name of his trading app is Robinhood. He has zero experience in the aerospace or space industries but we're supposed to send him truck loads of cash because he somehow has the secret sauce that will make this 60+ year old concept work when no one else could.
This!
 
This idea has been circulating for years. It's not practical due to the same atmosphere that was blocking most direct solar energy will still be in the way with pesky clouds and whatnot.

I'd rather see solar panels over roofs and parking areas with battery banks storing the excess for night time usage.

Or somehow change our cars’ dashboards into solar panels. They accumulate so much heat in the summer (even on sunny days in winter), this should provide some energy.
 
Put solar panels on every parking lot, there is more than enough parking lots in the US ro supply all our energy needs
You underestimate the power requirements to run the average US home in the Summer and overestimate how much power you can generate with solar panels even in a large parking lot.

Seriously? This guy is just looking to swindle investors out of their cash. Even the name of his trading app is Robinhood. He has zero experience in the aerospace or space industries but we're supposed to send him truck loads of cash because he somehow has the secret sauce that will make this 60+ year old concept work when no one else could.
I was going to say the same thing. He has degrees in physics and mathematics that while helpful for nearly every type of science alone they don't solve the issues of getting power generated in space to a city.

Or somehow change our cars’ dashboards into solar panels. They accumulate so much heat in the summer (even on sunny days in winter), this should provide some energy.
Solar panels and heat are different methods to get energy from the sun. A solar panel on your dashboard wouldn't get a useful amount of power and using the differences in temperature to generate power wouldn't generate much on such a small scale. The weight and cost of the equipment to make either of these systems function wouldn't at all be worth it.

 
In the old game Sim City 2000, one of the disaster scenarios involves a satellite-based microwave power plant destabilizing and baking a populated area. This seems like a disaster waiting to happen in the real world.
 
Sadly, just one more crackpot idea trying to produce ever more power to feed our insatiable thirst when a much simpler answer would be to limit that need by producing devices that simply use less.
 
Back