His comment went way over your head.Phone - yes, but hate how locked down ARM ecosystem devices tend to be; I would love it if I could get a phone with the same x86 chips going into gaming handhelds, running Windows or SteamOS-like Linux.
Tablet - no, but if I did buy one it would be a Windows ones with Lunar Lake, or one of the more recent AMD chips.
TV - yes, but I have all the "smart" functions disabled, and have it attached to a regular PC (older parts from my gaming machine get cycled into the HTPC). So much nicer to use than SMART TV or Settop box.
Car - I drive an older car without a screen on it. And there is no reason any x86 laptop APU wouldn't work just fine for fancy new cars.
Router - built my own router, using old PC parts. So much nicer than any crappy little ARM box.
Door cameras - no door cameras here.
Edit - just to add, my biggest issue with ARM is not really the ISA itself, but the fact that it is associated with so much locked down, restricted hardware/software that is really hard for the end user to modify. x86 machines just have that history of being more open and easy to modify, that results in far more useful devices for me, the person owning it.
Arm is in the wrong here. They don't get to tell other companies if and when they are allowed to acquire start-ups. That's a purely monopolistic stance that no doubt would not hold up in court, which may be why they are trying to bully Qualcomm like this, so they have no time to react with a court ruling.
The INDUSTRY rely on TSMC to survived...AMD relies on TSMC to survive....
And that's the only area where ARM shines, at the lowest level of power consumptions.If you use a phone it's 99% likely to be arm based.
The INDUSTRY rely on TSMC to survived...
No, they're failing at context, just like some of the comments above. Qualcomm has done nothing wrong. ARM is just being greedy asking for a new contract(and thus new fees) for the merged company instead of recognizing that the existing contract is still valid until it expires under it's original terms. This is not rocket science, it's basic contract law.ARMs is not determining if one company can aquire another. They are not trying to block the aquisition.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
“We are excited to come together with other industry players to drive the expansion of the RISC-V ecosystem through development of next-generation hardware. Qualcomm Technologies has been investing in RISC-V for more than five years and we’ve integrated RISC-V micro-controllers into many of our commercial platforms. We believe RISC-V’s open-source instruction set will increase innovation and has the potential to transform the industry,” Ziad Asghar, Senior Vice President of Product Management, Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
That's not true at all. AMD and Intel both have very attractive and competitive SOC products in most of those market spaces.
ARM, of course, is a British company. So even though it does business in the United States, there isn't really much chance the U.S. government could decide that ARM's behavior is anticompetitive and basically shut them down. Of course, Google (or rather Alphabet, I suppose) could use this as a reason to make the next generation of Android a RISC-V operating system.
Arm makes the designs for modern processors. it's makes it's money through selling licences to companies that use those designs. Those licence's are expensive for a big company like Qualcomm and relatively cheap for a start up like Nuvia. Qualcomm can't just buy Nuvia and to avoid paying for licence fees for their $39bn company.ARM makes nothing. They are a patent and litigation company.
you cant compare the two, because AMD actually designs their chips, unlike qualcomm.AMD relies on TSMC to survive....
Design is useless without manufacturing.you cant compare the two, because AMD actually designs their chips, unlike qualcomm.